Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On Monday 06 April 2009 04:29:02 Tom Lane wrote:
>> The only question I have is whether we want this nag message or not:
> If it is supposed to be DEBUG1, would you mind if I convert it to an elog so
> it doesn't appear in the translation roster?
Okay with me. You could use errmsg_internal but we have no equivalent
of errhint_internal, so I suppose it's got to be smashed to a single
message anyway if you don't want to translate it.
regards, tom lane