Re: Crash in gist insertion on pathological box data

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Subject: Re: Crash in gist insertion on pathological box data
Date: 2009-04-11 17:07:43
Message-ID: 25659.1239469663@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On Monday 06 April 2009 04:29:02 Tom Lane wrote:
>> The only question I have is whether we want this nag message or not:

> If it is supposed to be DEBUG1, would you mind if I convert it to an elog so
> it doesn't appear in the translation roster?

Okay with me. You could use errmsg_internal but we have no equivalent
of errhint_internal, so I suppose it's got to be smashed to a single
message anyway if you don't want to translate it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2009-04-11 17:15:50 Re: Allow COMMENT ON to accept an expression rather than just a string
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-04-11 17:06:45 Re: Unicode string literals versus the world