| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, Wang Haiyong <wanghaiyong(at)neusoft(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: bug in windows xp |
| Date: | 2006-04-19 14:15:54 |
| Message-ID: | 25658.1145456154@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-patches |
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> Not that I know of. However, the first step is to add this regression
> test for SIGFPE [-patches CCed].
This seems completely pointless. The question is not about whether the
SIGFPE catcher works when fired, it's about what conditions trigger it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-04-19 14:38:17 | Re: bug in windows xp |
| Previous Message | andrea suisani | 2006-04-19 11:20:22 | pg_dump or hardware? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-04-19 14:32:21 | Re: Two coverity non-bugs |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-04-19 12:02:54 | Two coverity non-bugs |