Re: [PATCH] Tab complete EXECUTE FUNCTION for CREATE (EVENT) TRIGGER

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Tab complete EXECUTE FUNCTION for CREATE (EVENT) TRIGGER
Date: 2018-10-26 10:06:41
Message-ID: 25629.1540548401@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 09:31:48AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Committed 0001 now which adds tab completion for CREATE TRIGGER.

> And 0002 is committed as well. Thanks for the patches!

The committed patches look sane to me, but should we back-patch into 11?
This isn't quite a bug fix maybe, but it's inconsistent if v11 server &
docs recommend this syntax while v11 psql doesn't produce it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2018-10-26 10:08:44 Re: Should pg 11 use a lot more memory building an spgist index?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-10-26 09:59:43 Re: Should pg 11 use a lot more memory building an spgist index?