Re: pq_setkeepalives* functions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pq_setkeepalives* functions
Date: 2010-03-13 16:24:30
Message-ID: 2534.1268497470@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Jaime Casanova wrote:
>> but in pq_setkeepalivesinterval() the #DEFINE is after the
>> conditional, doesn't seems to affect anything but for consistency with
>> the other two :)

> Thanks, applied.

This makes the function *not* like the other two, rather than
improving consistency.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-03-13 16:40:35 Re: Dyamic updates of NEW with pl/pgsql
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-03-13 15:35:50 Re: pq_setkeepalives* functions