Re: [HACKERS] Problem with complex query

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: phd2(at)earthling(dot)net, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Problem with complex query
Date: 1999-05-09 17:49:05
Message-ID: 2504.926272145@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> SELECT DISTINCT p.subsec_id
>> FROM central cn, shops sh, districts d, positions p
>> WHERE cn.shop_id = sh.shop_id AND sh.distr_id = d.distr_id
>> AND d.city_id = %d AND cn.pos_id = p.pos_id
>> AND cn.date_i >= current_date - '7 days'::timespan
>>
>> While running postgres slowly eats all swap space (30 Meg) and aborts:

> Not sure how to comment on this. Is 6.5beta any better?

Probably not :-(. My guess is that the expression "current_date -
'7 days'::timespan" is being re-evaluated at each tuple, and since
we don't yet have intra-statement space recovery, the palloc'd space
just grows and grows. Oleg, can you try evaluating that expression
on the application side and sending over a constant instead?

I think being able to recover palloc'd space after every few tuples
will have to be a top priority for 6.6; we've seen too many complaints
that trace back to this sort of thing.

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-05-09 20:09:02 Re: [GENERAL] Comments on columns?
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-05-09 17:40:05 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Number of parameters in a sql function