Re: [GENERAL] Comments on columns?

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Davis <michael(dot)davis(at)prevuenet(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Comments on columns?
Date: 1999-05-09 20:09:02
Message-ID: 199905092009.QAA25649@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

> I created functions to add comments based on the table and column name
> rather than using the oids. I include these calls as part of my table
> creation scripts. I assume that by initdb you mean when the database is
> created than when Postgres is started. If the oids can change every time
> you start Posgtres, this would be a problem.
>
> I can upload my functions for integrating into Postgres as a standard way to
> add comments (if requested). Maybe we should consider attaching
> descriptions to a table and or column name rather than an oid?

I like to keep using the oid because it allows comments on functions and
operators, which would make a 'name'-based system work badly.

I plan to add system tablename/column descriptions by doing some kind of
name/oid mapping function for this. This will happen after 6.5.

I will also try to add some standard way of adding descriptions.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Bitmead 1999-05-10 00:13:07 Re: [GENERAL] Empty Date Field
Previous Message Oliver Elphick 1999-05-09 18:38:07 Re: [GENERAL] Empty Date Field

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-05-09 20:10:52 Re: [HACKERS] libpq and SPI
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-05-09 17:49:05 Re: [HACKERS] Problem with complex query