| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 7.4 features list |
| Date: | 2003-05-07 04:33:17 |
| Message-ID: | 24718.1052281997@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> writes:
> I don't have any long term "low expectations" of the win32 port, just
> transient ones. That is, it is a fairly radical port, more so than
> moving between unix environments. ... To assume that
> we will nail all of this on the first pass is hubris.
Yup, exzackle. After a release or two we might think that the win32 port
is production ready (meaning as-reliable-as-you-think-the-platform-is).
It's not rational to think that the first release will be as stable on
win32 as our longtime Unix ports are --- and we'd be remiss if we don't
make that clear to users.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-05-07 04:45:30 | Re: 7.4 features list |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-05-07 04:24:50 | Re: 7.4 features list |