Re: 7.4 features list

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Barry Lind <blind(at)xythos(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 7.4 features list
Date: 2003-05-07 04:45:30
Message-ID: 200305070445.h474jVQ03786@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Barry Lind <blind(at)xythos(dot)com> writes:
> > I plan to clear some time very soon to work on moving jdbc to the
> > version 3 protocol. What is the status of the version 3 protocol
> > changes, are you done?
>
> I have implemented everything I wanted to do at the protocol level
> except for fixing the handling of binary values, which is something
> I hope to get done in the next few days. It's not too soon to start
> working on JDBC's support, if you have free time now. There are lots
> of loose ends (for instance, *every* backend error currently returns
> the same "XX000" SQLSTATE code) but I do not think there are any
> showstoppers for frontend development.
>
> > And yes an extra couple of weeks would ensure that I get more of the
> > version 3 protocol functionality into the jdbc driver.
>
> Check. The wind seems to be blowing towards a July 1 beta date.

Tom, I am seeing "IN ... func..." in the server logs for every LOG:
message. Is that planned behavior?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-05-07 04:55:33 Re: 7.4 features list
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-05-07 04:33:17 Re: 7.4 features list