Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance tweak

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance tweak
Date: 2005-10-21 18:42:19
Message-ID: 24628.1129920139@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu> writes:
> Shall we add "volatile" quanlifier to at least pg_signal_queue?

If that's changed by a separate thread, "volatile" seems essential.
What about the mask variable?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-10-21 18:47:35 Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2005-10-21 18:18:33 Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance tweak