From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: [GENERAL] pg_dump behaves differently for different archive formats |
Date: | 2014-07-29 16:38:16 |
Message-ID: | 2459.1406651896@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> If we had something like that, I'd be strongly inclined to get rid of
>> the existing convention whereby comments and ACL commands are separate
>> TOC entries, and make them part of the parent object's TOC entry (which'd
>> mean we'd want to label the sub-strings so we can tell whether they are
>> main object, comment, or ACL). The fewer TOC entries we can have, the
>> better; there is no reason why comments/ACLs should be independently
>> sortable.
> Maybe, but I think people will still want an option to skip restoring
> them altogether (at least for ACLs).
Sure; we already have such an option, and I'm not suggesting removing
it. The implementation would change though: it would have to look at
the individual command labels to see which part(s) of a TOC entry to
print out.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-07-29 16:41:05 | Re: Problems with pg_upgrade. |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-07-29 16:35:35 | Re: Re: [GENERAL] pg_dump behaves differently for different archive formats |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-07-29 16:51:18 | Re: pg_background (and more parallelism infrastructure patches) |
Previous Message | Marco Nenciarini | 2014-07-29 16:35:51 | Re: Proposal: Incremental Backup |