| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Trond Eivind Glomsrød <teg(at)redhat(dot)com>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Holger Klawitter <holger(at)klawitter(dot)de>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) |
| Date: | 2000-10-27 00:29:52 |
| Message-ID: | 24549.972606592@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I believe 7.0->7.1 will be able to talk in any
> 7.0.X/7.1 client and server combination.
This should work as far as simple connectivity goes, but 7.0
applications that do queries against system catalogs might find
that their queries need to be updated. For example, psql's backslash
commands didn't recognize views for awhile due to pg_class.relkind
changes.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | K Parker | 2000-10-27 00:43:23 | Re: persistent connection |
| Previous Message | Steve Wolfe | 2000-10-27 00:06:14 | Re: Postgres 7.0.2-2 on Red Hat 7.0? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2000-10-27 00:47:32 | Re: pgsql/src/backend/nodes (copyfuncs.c outfuncs.c print.c) |
| Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-10-27 00:17:27 | Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-10-27 03:11:34 | Re: 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) |
| Previous Message | Lamar Owen | 2000-10-26 23:43:33 | Re: 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) |