Re: server-side extension in c++

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, Igor <igor(at)carcass(dot)ath(dot)cx>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: server-side extension in c++
Date: 2010-06-01 03:13:34
Message-ID: 24516.1275362014@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>>> Well, I would have avoided this mine-trap except we have this 9.0
>>> release note item:
>>> Allow use of <productname>C++</> functions in backend code (Kurt
>>> Harriman, Peter Eisentraut)

> So should I just comment it out and then when someone gets serious we
> can use it as a starting point for them?

Sure. While you're at it, tone down the release-note item. It should
read more like "Take some steps towards allowing use ...", because C++
keywords in the header files surely were not the only stumbling block.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2010-06-01 03:19:56 Re: server-side extension in c++
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-06-01 03:06:14 Re: server-side extension in c++