Re: server-side extension in c++

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, Igor <igor(at)carcass(dot)ath(dot)cx>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: server-side extension in c++
Date: 2010-06-01 03:19:56
Message-ID: 201006010319.o513JuE24672@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> >>> Well, I would have avoided this mine-trap except we have this 9.0
> >>> release note item:
> >>> Allow use of <productname>C++</> functions in backend code (Kurt
> >>> Harriman, Peter Eisentraut)
>
> > So should I just comment it out and then when someone gets serious we
> > can use it as a starting point for them?
>
> Sure. While you're at it, tone down the release-note item. It should
> read more like "Take some steps towards allowing use ...", because C++
> keywords in the header files surely were not the only stumbling block.

OK, done with attached, applied patch.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ None of us is going to be here forever. +

Attachment Content-Type Size
/rtmp/diff text/x-diff 1.9 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2010-06-01 03:45:15 Re: INSERTing lots of data
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-06-01 03:13:34 Re: server-side extension in c++