From: | Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SQL feature requests |
Date: | 2007-08-23 19:38:46 |
Message-ID: | 23A0A8D4-B86A-4D98-9C8A-1D918A52F6AF@seespotcode.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Aug 23, 2007, at 14:25 , Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>> I just don't see the ability to omit the alias in a query with
>> only one
>> subquery (the only circumstances under which it would be safe to
>> do so) as
>> any significant gain in fuctionality.
>
> Why do you think it'd be restricted to only one subquery?
>
> As long as you take care that the subquery's column names don't match
> any other ones in the query, you don't *need* an alias for it ---
> there'll be no need to qualify the column names. This extends just
> fine to multiple subqueries.
How about something like gensym? One alias you could always use and
be guaranteed it would give a unique value. Still provide the alias,
but don't have to think about name collisions.
Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-08-23 19:44:13 | Re: SQL feature requests |
Previous Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2007-08-23 19:36:56 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add configure option --with-system-tzdata to use operating system |