Re: SQL feature requests

From: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SQL feature requests
Date: 2007-08-23 19:38:46
Message-ID: 23A0A8D4-B86A-4D98-9C8A-1D918A52F6AF@seespotcode.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Aug 23, 2007, at 14:25 , Tom Lane wrote:

> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>> I just don't see the ability to omit the alias in a query with
>> only one
>> subquery (the only circumstances under which it would be safe to
>> do so) as
>> any significant gain in fuctionality.
>
> Why do you think it'd be restricted to only one subquery?
>
> As long as you take care that the subquery's column names don't match
> any other ones in the query, you don't *need* an alias for it ---
> there'll be no need to qualify the column names. This extends just
> fine to multiple subqueries.

How about something like gensym? One alias you could always use and
be guaranteed it would give a unique value. Still provide the alias,
but don't have to think about name collisions.

Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-08-23 19:44:13 Re: SQL feature requests
Previous Message Zdenek Kotala 2007-08-23 19:36:56 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add configure option --with-system-tzdata to use operating system