| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | manfred(at)colorfullife(dot)com, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] libpq and psql not on same page about SIGPIPE |
| Date: | 2004-12-02 03:47:22 |
| Message-ID: | 2395.1101959242@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> No, that's wrong: if there is a pending SIGPIPE that belongs to the
>> outer app, you'd clear it.
> True, but I documented that in the patch.
A documented bug is still a bug. The entire point of this change is to
not interfere with the behavior of the surrounding app, at least not
more than we absolutely have to; and we do not have to clear SIGPIPEs
that are certainly not ours.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2004-12-02 04:05:12 | Re: Please release (was Re: nodeAgg perf tweak) |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-12-02 03:45:15 | Re: [HACKERS] libpq and psql not on same page about SIGPIPE |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-12-02 04:08:29 | Re: [HACKERS] libpq and psql not on same page about SIGPIPE |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-12-02 03:45:15 | Re: [HACKERS] libpq and psql not on same page about SIGPIPE |