Re: [HACKERS] libpq and psql not on same page about SIGPIPE

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: manfred(at)colorfullife(dot)com, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] libpq and psql not on same page about SIGPIPE
Date: 2004-12-02 04:08:29
Message-ID: 200412020408.iB248Tl16515@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> No, that's wrong: if there is a pending SIGPIPE that belongs to the
> >> outer app, you'd clear it.
>
> > True, but I documented that in the patch.
>
> A documented bug is still a bug. The entire point of this change is to
> not interfere with the behavior of the surrounding app, at least not
> more than we absolutely have to; and we do not have to clear SIGPIPEs
> that are certainly not ours.

I am working on a new version that doesn't have this problem. Will post
soon.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Fuhr 2004-12-02 04:10:29 Re: New compile warnings for inheritance
Previous Message Neil Conway 2004-12-02 04:05:12 Re: Please release (was Re: nodeAgg perf tweak)

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2004-12-02 04:12:13 Re: Update for documentation on CVS
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-12-02 03:47:22 Re: [HACKERS] libpq and psql not on same page about SIGPIPE