| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan Ploski <jpljpl(at)gmx(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Is v7.1 stable enough? |
| Date: | 2001-03-14 05:33:18 |
| Message-ID: | 23808.984547998@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Jan Ploski <jpljpl(at)gmx(dot)de> writes:
> how stable is the current 7.1 code? Can it be used in a production
> environment or is it meant for internal bug squashing only? Am I
> asking for problems?
You want an honest opinion? I'd say 7.1 is on the cusp: it's probably
stable enough for production use, but there are probably a few bugs left
too. If you're willing to run regular backups and report/help track
down bugs, then go for it. If you want to leave the work to other
people, then go away and come back in a few months.
Note that we have just been making some changes in the WAL log format.
You can save yourself some upgrade trouble if you use a snapshot dated
after today --- or perhaps safer, wait for the next formal beta release.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-03-14 05:42:03 | Re: pg_temp.<pid>.<int> |
| Previous Message | Aaron Cline | 2001-03-14 05:13:53 | Timestamp interval question |