Re: EXECUTE status (was Re: [ODBC] About server side prepare)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Jeroen T(dot) Vermeulen" <jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: EXECUTE status (was Re: [ODBC] About server side prepare)
Date: 2002-12-20 18:05:39
Message-ID: 23760.1040407539@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-odbc

"Jeroen T. Vermeulen" <jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl> writes:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 12:56:55PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> No. It would break client libraries, which only expect command tags
>> INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE to be followed by counts.

> And MOVE, right?

Mph ... PQcmdTuples only knows about INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE. Looks like
we already made this mistake once before ;-).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mikheev, Vadim 2002-12-20 19:45:57 PostgreSQL-R
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-12-20 18:02:58 Re: EXECUTE status (was Re: [ODBC] About server side prepare)

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2002-12-22 23:49:40 Re: EXECUTE status (was Re: [ODBC] About server side prepare)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-12-20 18:02:58 Re: EXECUTE status (was Re: [ODBC] About server side prepare)