| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: EXECUTE status (was Re: [ODBC] About server side prepare) |
| Date: | 2002-12-20 18:02:58 |
| Message-ID: | 23730.1040407378@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-odbc |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> It is easy to determine what tag to return? Remember the discussion on
> rules and that only the original tag should be returned. Is there
> always one obvious tag to an execute?
I would think we'd do it via the rule that we return the same thing
you'd get if you directly issued the query that appears as the body
of the PREPARE command. All the special cases for rules and so on
seem to apply the same way if you do that.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-12-20 18:05:39 | Re: EXECUTE status (was Re: [ODBC] About server side prepare) |
| Previous Message | Jeroen T. Vermeulen | 2002-12-20 18:02:39 | Re: EXECUTE status (was Re: [ODBC] About server side prepare) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-12-20 18:05:39 | Re: EXECUTE status (was Re: [ODBC] About server side prepare) |
| Previous Message | Jeroen T. Vermeulen | 2002-12-20 18:02:39 | Re: EXECUTE status (was Re: [ODBC] About server side prepare) |