Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load
Date: 1999-05-05 13:33:14
Message-ID: 2367.925911194@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> writes:
> That's why I noticed 10 or more (postmaster) processes, which eventually
> gone after 30-40 minutes.

Could those be new backends that have been forked off the main
postmaster, but haven't yet gotten around to changing their ps info?
I'm not sure what would block a new backend for many minutes before
it did that, however. Can you attach to one of these processes with
a debugger and get a backtrace to show what it's doing?

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-05-05 13:51:12 Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement
Previous Message José Soares 1999-05-05 13:32:29 Re: [HACKERS] RE: [INTERFACES] error message