| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers list" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Testing mail list |
| Date: | 2007-12-19 16:15:37 |
| Message-ID: | 23554.1198080937@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> It's worse than that in this case. This is an *impressively* broken
> configuration.
Understatement of the week. The mail includes absolutely no evidence
about what message is allegedly being filtered. Are you sure that
this is really a filtering engine at all, and not just random spam
hoping to draw responses from careless people? I've heard of web
comment-spammers who try to get other people to decode captchas
for them this way.
Adding to my suspicion is that I don't recall having seen one of these
personally, and if it were really tied to posting on any of the PG
lists, I shoulda seen a lot ;-)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-12-19 16:24:25 | Re: Testing mail list |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-12-19 15:54:07 | Re: Sorting Improvements for 8.4 |