| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Testing mail list |
| Date: | 2007-12-19 16:24:25 |
| Message-ID: | 20071219162425.GH9937@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> > It's worse than that in this case. This is an *impressively* broken
> > configuration.
>
> Understatement of the week. The mail includes absolutely no evidence
> about what message is allegedly being filtered. Are you sure that
> this is really a filtering engine at all, and not just random spam
> hoping to draw responses from careless people? I've heard of web
> comment-spammers who try to get other people to decode captchas
> for them this way.
>
> Adding to my suspicion is that I don't recall having seen one of these
> personally, and if it were really tied to posting on any of the PG
> lists, I shoulda seen a lot ;-)
Yeah, I think it comes from pgsql-performance. I just got one
mentioning an address to which I had responded some minutes before.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2007-12-19 16:33:42 | Re: Testing mail list |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-12-19 16:15:37 | Re: Testing mail list |