Re: Using temp tables

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: a(dot)schmitz(at)cityweb(dot)de
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Using temp tables
Date: 2003-07-18 13:36:47
Message-ID: 23461.1058535407@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Andreas Schmitz <a(dot)schmitz(at)cityweb(dot)de> writes:
> I did a vacuum full and analyze but this pg_temp namespaces are still there.
> Any ideas about that phenomena ?

They're supposed to be there; we recycle the pg_namespace entry across
successive backend sessions. I see no point in deleting it only to have
to make it again in a later session.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2003-07-18 14:06:29 Re: Database growth problem
Previous Message Marvin 2003-07-18 12:31:34 UltraSQL problem.