Re: [HACKERS] Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> If you put a contition test in set_ps_display(), the only clean way to
> do this is for init_ps_display() to force update_process_title to true
> before we call set_ps_display(), then reset it to its original value,
> but that sounds pretty ugly.

No, refactor the code. I was envisioning something called maybe
transmit_ps_display that would contain the part of set_ps_display
beginning at "Transmit new setting to kernel". Then both set_ps_display
and init_ps_display would call that.

regards, tom lane