Re: [HACKERS] Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > If you put a contition test in set_ps_display(), the only clean way to
> > do this is for init_ps_display() to force update_process_title to true
> > before we call set_ps_display(), then reset it to its original value,
> > but that sounds pretty ugly.
>
> No, refactor the code. I was envisioning something called maybe
> transmit_ps_display that would contain the part of set_ps_display
> beginning at "Transmit new setting to kernel". Then both set_ps_display
> and init_ps_display would call that.

I went with a 'force' boolean for set_ps_display().

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +