Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Kevin Brown <kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier
Date: 2003-04-02 21:18:33
Message-ID: 23249.1049318313@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Kevin Brown <kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com> writes:
> Hmm...I don't know that I'd want to go that far -- setting this
> variable could be regarded as a policy decision. Some shops may have
> very good reason for running with ZERO_DAMAGED_PAGES enabled all the
> time, but I don't know what those reasons might be.

I would buy this argument if I could imagine even a faintly plausible
reason for doing that ... but I can't.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Frank Wiles 2003-04-02 21:32:55 TODO list problem or am I way off base?
Previous Message Jason Earl 2003-04-02 21:07:02 Re: Detecting corrupted pages earlier