Re: NOCREATETABLE patch (was: Re: Please, help!(about Postgres))

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>, Максим М(dot) Поляков <max(at)bresttelecom(dot)by>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: NOCREATETABLE patch (was: Re: Please, help!(about Postgres))
Date: 2001-05-07 21:33:42
Message-ID: 23233.989271222@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Can someone remind me what we are going to do with this?

I'd like to see some effort put into implementing the SQL-standard
privilege model, rather than adding yet more ad-hoc user properties.
The more of these we make, the more painful it's going to be to meet
the spec later.

Possibly, after we have the SQL semantics we'll still feel that we
need some additional features ... but how about spec first and
extensions afterwards?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message mlw 2001-05-07 21:41:28 Re: File system performance and pg_xlog (More info)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-05-07 21:22:52 Re: Lisp as procedural language