Re: Lisp as procedural language

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Vladimir V(dot) Zolotych" <gsmith(at)eurocom(dot)od(dot)ua>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Lisp as procedural language
Date: 2001-05-07 21:22:52
Message-ID: 23155.989270572@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Can someone explain why we have a lisp.sgml file in our docs? Seems it
> descripes a 3rd party Emacs interface. I don't think we should start
> distributing docs for software we don't distribute. Can I remove it?

Only if you move the pointer to someplace more appropriate (don't we
have somewhere on the website with links to outside software?)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-05-07 21:33:42 Re: NOCREATETABLE patch (was: Re: Please, help!(about Postgres))
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-05-07 21:03:12 Re: typo in psql's help