Re: Memory allocation in spi_printtup()

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neil(dot)conway(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Memory allocation in spi_printtup()
Date: 2015-08-22 00:33:56
Message-ID: 23145.1440203636@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Neil Conway <neil(dot)conway(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Should we back-patch this change? Seems like it's arguably a
>> performance bug.

> Sounds good to me.

Committed and back-patched.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kouhei Kaigai 2015-08-22 00:37:02 Re: DBT-3 with SF=20 got failed
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2015-08-22 00:27:05 Re: Error message with plpgsql CONTINUE