Re: Include Lists for Text Search

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Include Lists for Text Search
Date: 2008-03-10 14:01:57
Message-ID: 23115.1205157717@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I think if you post something marked Work In Progress, there is an
> implied commitment on your part to post something complete at a later stage.

It *wasn't* marked Work In Progress, and Simon went out of his way to
cross-post it to -patches, where the thread previously had not been:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2007-09/msg00150.php

I don't think either Bruce or I can be faulted for assuming that it was
meant to be applied. In future perhaps I should take it as a given that
Simon doesn't expect his patches to be applied?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-03-10 14:05:22 Re: Include Lists for Text Search
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2008-03-10 13:43:09 Re: Maximum statistics target

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-03-10 14:05:22 Re: Include Lists for Text Search
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2008-03-10 13:42:43 Re: Include Lists for Text Search