| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Include Lists for Text Search |
| Date: | 2008-03-10 14:05:22 |
| Message-ID: | 1205157922.4269.117.camel@ebony.site |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 09:42 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I think if you post something marked Work In Progress, there is an
> implied commitment on your part to post something complete at a later stage.
>
> So if it's forgotten you would be the one doing the forgetting. ;-)
But if they aren't on a review list, they won't get reviewed, no matter
what their status. So everybody has to maintain their own status list
and re-submit patches for review monthly until reviewed?
I like the idea of marking things WIP, but I think we need a clear
system where we agree that multiple statuses exist and that they are
described in particular ways.
--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-10 14:17:31 | Re: Include Lists for Text Search |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-10 14:01:57 | Re: Include Lists for Text Search |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-10 14:17:31 | Re: Include Lists for Text Search |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-10 14:01:57 | Re: Include Lists for Text Search |