From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Change the way that LWLocks for extensions are allocated. |
Date: | 2016-11-12 16:42:12 |
Message-ID: | 22899.1478968932@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2016-11-12 11:30:42 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> which is a rather blatant waste of cycles. I would suggest an explicit
>> do-nothing installcheck rule rather than the hack you came up with here.
> I had that at first, but that generates a warning about overwriting the
> makefile target - which afaics cannot be fixed.
Hm. What about inventing an additional macro NO_INSTALLCHECK that
prevents pgxs.mk from generating an installcheck rule? It's not
like we don't have similar issues elsewhere, eg contrib/sepgsql.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2016-11-12 17:12:25 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Change the way that LWLocks for extensions are allocated. |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2016-11-12 16:35:08 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Change the way that LWLocks for extensions are allocated. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2016-11-12 17:12:25 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Change the way that LWLocks for extensions are allocated. |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2016-11-12 16:35:08 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Change the way that LWLocks for extensions are allocated. |