Re: Parallel build with MSVC

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Christian Ullrich <chris(at)chrullrich(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel build with MSVC
Date: 2016-09-05 00:26:12
Message-ID: 22817.1473035172@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> writes:
> I was tempted to back-patch this. The risk to back branch users seems
> negligible, and it would be convenient for me as a person who builds all
> branches. That reason is not good enough, so I plan not to back-patch. I
> feel like I might be missing a stronger reason to back-patch.

Hm, wouldn't it help reduce the cycle time for Windows buildfarm members?
That might still not be adequate reason, but it's an advantage beyond
time-saving for individual developers.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Karlsson 2016-09-05 00:32:56 Re: OpenSSL 1.1 breaks configure and more
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-09-05 00:23:43 Re: OpenSSL 1.1 breaks configure and more