| From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Christian Ullrich <chris(at)chrullrich(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Parallel build with MSVC |
| Date: | 2016-09-05 00:47:54 |
| Message-ID: | 20160905004754.GB3489208@tornado.leadboat.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 08:26:12PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> writes:
> > I was tempted to back-patch this. The risk to back branch users seems
> > negligible, and it would be convenient for me as a person who builds all
> > branches. That reason is not good enough, so I plan not to back-patch. I
> > feel like I might be missing a stronger reason to back-patch.
>
> Hm, wouldn't it help reduce the cycle time for Windows buildfarm members?
> That might still not be adequate reason, but it's an advantage beyond
> time-saving for individual developers.
Yes; multi-core Windows buildfarm members could configure MSBFLAGS=/m to
finish more quickly.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-09-05 00:52:36 | Re: Yet another small patch - reorderbuffer.c:1099 |
| Previous Message | Andreas Karlsson | 2016-09-05 00:32:56 | Re: OpenSSL 1.1 breaks configure and more |