From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Add 'basebackup_to_shell' contrib module. |
Date: | 2022-03-30 16:34:34 |
Message-ID: | 228044.1648658074@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> Because I forgot about cfbot when attaching the patch, cfbot actually ran with
> it under this thread's cf entry. It does look like an improvement to me:
> https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6397292629458944?logs=test_world#L900
> We certainly can do better, but it's sufficiently better than what we have
> right now. So I'd like to commit it?
No objection here.
>> Would we want to do this in all branches? I'd vote for yes, but ...
> Unless somebody speaks in favor of doing this across branches, I'd just go for
> HEAD.
+1 for HEAD only, especially if we think we might change it some more
later. It seems possible this might break somebody's tooling if we
drop it into minor releases.
One refinement that comes to mind as I look at the patch is to distinguish
between "check" and "installcheck". Not sure that's worthwhile, but not
sure it isn't, either.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2022-03-30 16:35:24 | pgsql: ci: enable zstd where available. |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2022-03-30 16:30:24 | Re: pgsql: Add 'basebackup_to_shell' contrib module. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2022-03-30 16:42:50 | Re: pgsql: Add 'basebackup_to_shell' contrib module. |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2022-03-30 16:31:48 | Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints |