From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Maciek Sakrejda <m(dot)sakrejda(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints |
Date: | 2022-03-30 16:31:48 |
Message-ID: | 20220330163148.eqb7fgx6xsi4fnw5@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2022-03-30 09:28:58 +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 6:47 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> >
> >
> > du -s /tmp/initdb/
> > WAL_LOG: 35112
> > FILE_COPY: 29288
> >
> > So it seems we should specify a strategy in initdb? It kind of makes sense -
> > we're not going to read anything from those database. And because of the
> > ringbuffer of 256kB, we'll not even reduce IO meaningfully.
>
> I think this makes sense, so you mean with initdb we will always use
> file_copy or we want to give a command line option for initdb ?
Don't see a need for a commandline option / a situation where using WAL_LOG
would be preferrable for initdb.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-03-30 16:34:34 | Re: pgsql: Add 'basebackup_to_shell' contrib module. |
Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2022-03-30 16:30:51 | Re: make MaxBackends available in _PG_init |