From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification |
Date: | 2001-11-16 04:12:24 |
Message-ID: | 22765.1005883944@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Fine with me. I guess I'll wait with the new table a bit yet. ;-)
The coast is clear now ...
I divided the keywords into four mutually exclusive, all inclusive
category lists:
unreserved_keyword
col_name_keyword
func_name_keyword
reserved_keyword
which I trust will not be a problem for your document-generating
script.
ecpg has some finer distinctions but I'm happy to leave those
undocumented.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2001-11-16 04:37:51 | Re: [HACKERS] Open Items (was: RE: [HACKERS] Beta going well) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-11-16 03:56:43 | ecpg test problem |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2001-11-16 04:37:51 | Re: [HACKERS] Open Items (was: RE: [HACKERS] Beta going well) |
Previous Message | Bill Studenmund | 2001-11-16 03:21:23 | Re: Patch to add Heimdal kerberos support |