From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #2600: dblink compile with SSL missing libraries |
Date: | 2006-08-31 18:45:49 |
Message-ID: | 22538.1157049949@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Am Mittwoch, 30. August 2006 22:57 schrieb Chris Browne:
>> I also seem to recall, in past discussions about "library matters,"
>> that AIX is more sticky about requiring that libraries be named
>> expressly.
> ecpglib has
> SHLIB_LINK = -L../pgtypeslib -lpgtypes $(libpq) \
> $(filter -lintl -lssl -lcrypto -lkrb5 -lcrypt -lm, $(LIBS))
> $(PTHREAD_LIBS)
> ifeq ($(PORTNAME), win32)
> # Link to shfolder.dll instead of shell32.dll
> SHLIB_LINK += -lshfolder
> endif
> Presumably the same would be necessary everywhere else libpq is used.
Surely it'd be better to put that into the $(libpq) macro instead.
I see that Makefile.global already has an AIX-specific hack to deal with
PTHREAD_LIBS that way, maybe we need to extend it?
Also, the list of potential library dependencies in libpq's own Makefile
is quite a bit longer than this list ... perhaps ecpg's list is too
short?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adailson | 2006-09-01 19:20:00 | BUG #2605: Log de ERRO |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2006-08-31 16:11:52 | Re: BUG #2603: SQLDescribeCol return values |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-31 18:48:19 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] log_statement output for protocol |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-08-31 18:41:41 | Re: Thought provoking piece on NetBSD |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-31 18:48:19 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] log_statement output for protocol |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-31 18:36:28 | Re: [PATCHES] Backend SSL configuration enhancement |