Re: BUG #2600: dblink compile with SSL missing

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #2600: dblink compile with SSL missing
Date: 2006-09-03 01:30:46
Message-ID: 200609030130.k831UkJ26611@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches


Where are we on this?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > Am Mittwoch, 30. August 2006 22:57 schrieb Chris Browne:
> >> I also seem to recall, in past discussions about "library matters,"
> >> that AIX is more sticky about requiring that libraries be named
> >> expressly.
>
> > ecpglib has
>
> > SHLIB_LINK = -L../pgtypeslib -lpgtypes $(libpq) \
> > $(filter -lintl -lssl -lcrypto -lkrb5 -lcrypt -lm, $(LIBS))
> > $(PTHREAD_LIBS)
>
> > ifeq ($(PORTNAME), win32)
> > # Link to shfolder.dll instead of shell32.dll
> > SHLIB_LINK += -lshfolder
> > endif
>
> > Presumably the same would be necessary everywhere else libpq is used.
>
> Surely it'd be better to put that into the $(libpq) macro instead.
> I see that Makefile.global already has an AIX-specific hack to deal with
> PTHREAD_LIBS that way, maybe we need to extend it?
>
> Also, the list of potential library dependencies in libpq's own Makefile
> is quite a bit longer than this list ... perhaps ecpg's list is too
> short?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-09-03 03:47:18 Re: BUG #2599: AM/PM doesn't work in to_timestamp in
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-09-03 01:21:53 Re: BUG #2599: AM/PM doesn't work in to_timestamp in

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-09-03 01:31:47 Re: Autovacuum on by default?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-09-03 01:30:25 Re: better support of out parameters in plperl

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-09-03 01:44:44 Re: better support of out parameters in plperl
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-09-03 01:30:25 Re: better support of out parameters in plperl