From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Rodrigo Moreno" <rodrigo(dot)miguel(at)terra(dot)com(dot)br> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: How to improve postgres performace |
Date: | 2005-04-18 15:58:10 |
Message-ID: | 22280.1113839890@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice pgsql-performance |
"Rodrigo Moreno" <rodrigo(dot)miguel(at)terra(dot)com(dot)br> writes:
> At this weekend i have started to use pg_autovacuum with default settings.
> I really worried about that, because it's no enough anymore, and users claim
> about performace. But running the vacuumdb full, everthing starts to run
> better again, so i think the problem is not related to a specific query.
It sounds like you may not have the FSM settings set large enough for
your database. The default settings are only enough for a small DB
(perhaps a few hundred meg).
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rodrigo Moreno | 2005-04-18 16:31:22 | RES: How to improve postgres performace |
Previous Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-04-18 15:45:12 | Re: PostgreSQL Guide for Oracle Users? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrei Gaspar | 2005-04-18 16:11:38 | Re: Sort and index |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-18 15:50:49 | Re: immutable functions vs. join for lookups ? |