From: | "Rodrigo Moreno" <rodrigo(dot)miguel(at)terra(dot)com(dot)br> |
---|---|
To: | "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RES: How to improve postgres performace |
Date: | 2005-04-18 16:31:22 |
Message-ID: | 20050418163126.E004E14C097@talara.terra.com.br |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice pgsql-performance |
Tom,
How to check if the value it's enough ? The log generate by vacuum verbose
can help ?
The current values for:
max_fsm_pages = 1048576
max_fsm_relations = 1000
this is enough ?
Regards,
Rodrigo
-----Mensagem original-----
De: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 18 de abril de 2005 12:58
Para: Rodrigo Moreno
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Assunto: Re: [PERFORM] How to improve postgres performace
"Rodrigo Moreno" <rodrigo(dot)miguel(at)terra(dot)com(dot)br> writes:
> At this weekend i have started to use pg_autovacuum with default settings.
> I really worried about that, because it's no enough anymore, and users
> claim about performace. But running the vacuumdb full, everthing
> starts to run better again, so i think the problem is not related to a
specific query.
It sounds like you may not have the FSM settings set large enough for your
database. The default settings are only enough for a small DB (perhaps a
few hundred meg).
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-18 17:32:48 | Re: RES: How to improve postgres performace |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-18 15:58:10 | Re: How to improve postgres performace |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alex Turner | 2005-04-18 16:56:48 | Re: How to improve db performance with $7K? |
Previous Message | Andrei Gaspar | 2005-04-18 16:11:38 | Re: Sort and index |