Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org>
Cc: Ryan Kirkpatrick <rkirkpat(at)rkirkpat(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Date: 2000-12-27 23:10:07
Message-ID: 22248.977958607@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org> writes:
> this patch fixes the SEGV problem in the regression tests. the only
> remaining failures, which are not due to SEGV, are:
> oid ... FAILED
> float8 ... FAILED
> geometry ... FAILED

What are the regression diffs, exactly?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brent Verner 2000-12-27 23:35:30 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Previous Message Brent Verner 2000-12-27 23:05:55 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brent Verner 2000-12-27 23:35:30 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Previous Message Brent Verner 2000-12-27 23:05:55 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)