From: | Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Ryan Kirkpatrick <rkirkpat(at)rkirkpat(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) |
Date: | 2000-12-27 23:05:55 |
Message-ID: | 20001227180555.A6402@rcfile.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On 27 Dec 2000 at 16:50 (-0500), Tom Lane wrote:
| After further study, I realized that fetchatt() and a number of other
| places were not prepared to cope with 8-byte pass-by-value datatypes.
| Most of them weren't checking for cases they couldn't handle, either.
|
| Here is a revised patch for you to try (this includes yesterday's patch
| plus more changes, so you'll need to reverse out the prior patch before
| applying this one). NOTE you will need to do a full reconfigure and
| rebuild to make this fly --- I'd suggest "make distclean" to start.
excellent!
this patch fixes the SEGV problem in the regression tests. the only
remaining failures, which are not due to SEGV, are:
oid ... FAILED
float8 ... FAILED
geometry ... FAILED
initial comments WRT failures:
float8 fails only when building with gcc.
oid recall seeing one-liner change to correct this. will try.
many thanks,
brent
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-12-27 23:10:07 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) |
Previous Message | Frank Joerdens | 2000-12-27 22:22:45 | Re: PHP and PostgreSQL |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-12-27 23:10:07 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-12-27 21:50:10 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) |