From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: CommitFest Status Summary - 2010-02-14 |
Date: | 2010-02-18 01:32:25 |
Message-ID: | 22156.1266456745@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> * Fix large object support in pg_dump. I think this is just waiting
>> for a second opinion on whether the approach is correct. I've been
>> meaning to look at it, but haven't gotten enough round tuits; maybe
>> someone else would like to take a look? This is an open item, so we
>> should really try to deal with it.
> Yeah, I think this is a "must fix for alpha" item. Will look at it
> tomorrow, god willin an the creek don't rise (or, given the weather
> around here: the power stays on).
I've applied that patch after some revisions.
The only thing still showing as open in the CommitFest webpage is
the last plperl patch. I think that's actually done but not marked
as committed; Andrew?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2010-02-18 01:40:31 | Re: Streaming replication on win32, still broken |
Previous Message | Michael Clemmons | 2010-02-18 01:04:12 | Michael Clemmons wants to stay in touch on LinkedIn |