| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Subject: | Re: CommitFest Status Summary - 2010-02-14 |
| Date: | 2010-02-17 06:39:16 |
| Message-ID: | 20194.1266388756@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> * Fix large object support in pg_dump. I think this is just waiting
> for a second opinion on whether the approach is correct. I've been
> meaning to look at it, but haven't gotten enough round tuits; maybe
> someone else would like to take a look? This is an open item, so we
> should really try to deal with it.
Yeah, I think this is a "must fix for alpha" item. Will look at it
tomorrow, god willin an the creek don't rise (or, given the weather
around here: the power stays on).
> * Faster CREATE DATABASE by delaying fsync. This is really two
> patches now, one of which is apparently to be backpatched.
This one (both parts) seems to have crashed and burned on unexpected
portability issues :-(. Do we have any expectation of being able to
fix it before alpha4?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2010-02-17 07:07:01 | Re: Streaming replication on win32, still broken |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-02-17 06:31:22 | Re: XQuery support |