From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Rémi Zara <remi_zara(at)mac(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Regression (semi)fix for netbsd-mac68k |
Date: | 2004-12-22 23:26:32 |
Message-ID: | 22053.1103757992@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi_Zara?= <remi_zara(at)mac(dot)com> writes:
> --- src/test/regress/resultmap.orig 2004-10-04 16:42:47.000000000=20
> +0200
> +++ src/test/regress/resultmap 2004-12-22 23:27:51.000000000 +0100
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> float8/i.86-.*-freebsd[234]=float8-small-is-zero
> float8/i.86-.*-openbsd=float8-small-is-zero
> float8/i.86-.*-netbsd=float8-small-is-zero
> +float8/m68k-.*-netbsd=float8-small-is-zero
> float8/.*-qnx=float8-exp-three-digits
> float8/i.86-pc-mingw32=float8-exp-three-digits-win32
> float8/i.86-pc-cygwin=float8-small-is-zero
Looks reasonable to me --- why do you call it only a "semi" fix?
I wonder whether we oughtn't remove the i.86- part from the patterns
for the BSDen, ie, assume they will have this behavior on all hardware
not just Intel.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rémi Zara | 2004-12-22 23:37:36 | Re: Regression (semi)fix for netbsd-mac68k |
Previous Message | Rémi Zara | 2004-12-22 22:46:02 | Regression (semi)fix for netbsd-mac68k |