Re: was enhancement of temp tables in plpgsql supposed to apply to temp view?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "christopher wood" <chrisj(dot)wood(at)sympatico(dot)ca>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: was enhancement of temp tables in plpgsql supposed to apply to temp view?
Date: 2007-12-01 16:44:18
Message-ID: 22043.1196527458@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

"christopher wood" <chrisj(dot)wood(at)sympatico(dot)ca> writes:
> 1. Should I not have received an e-mail of your reply, asking for an
> example?

Yup, in fact two of them: one copy direct and one via the mailing list.
You need to check into possible over-aggressive spam filtering at your
end.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-12-01 23:46:52 Re: [HACKERS] BUG #3774: create table like including index doesn't update pg_constraints with primary key
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-12-01 16:27:34 Re: bug when reload or restart -m smart