Re: Elaborate on phrase "table metadata" in the Notes section of ALTER by specifying pg_attribute

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: amin(at)gilani(dot)me, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Elaborate on phrase "table metadata" in the Notes section of ALTER by specifying pg_attribute
Date: 2024-09-18 07:22:02
Message-ID: 21ff4e12-0b59-4062-be22-f89c6e69773f@eisentraut.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On 11.09.24 22:12, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> Page:https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/sql-altertable.html
> Description:
>
> I am newish to Postgres, and the term "table metadata" was confusing to
> me.

I think it is pretty easy to do a quick internet search to find out what
table metadata is in the context of an SQL database. Your complaint
isn't wrong in the sense that the term isn't formally defined here, but
in this case I would opt against adding more text and leave it up to the
user to do the extra research as necessary. The operation being
discussed isn't something a completely new user would immediately
encounter, after all.

>
> I am more than happy to submit a patch for this. I'm just unfamiliar with
> the process. Please advise.
>
>> When a column is added with ADD COLUMN and a non-volatile DEFAULT is
> specified, the default is evaluated at the time of the statement and the
> result stored in the table's metadata. That value will be used for the
> column for all existing rows. If no DEFAULT is specified, NULL is used. In
> neither case is a rewrite of the table required.
>
> Specifically this sentence: "the result stored in the table's metadata"
>
> Suggest adding specific language to correct it to "the result stored in the
> table's metadata. See `pg_attribute` for more information."
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PG Doc comments form 2024-09-18 12:29:38 I use the example in this page ,but got error
Previous Message PG Doc comments form 2024-09-17 22:32:16 No details on how to use Hash partitions: no example, no syntax