Re: [HACKERS] LIMITS

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jan Wieck <jwieck(at)debis(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] LIMITS
Date: 1999-06-01 16:30:59
Message-ID: 21976.928254659@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> Until Marc officially releases BETA, you should allways
>> compile clean and run initdb after cvs updates. It's not the
>> first time you've got trapped by this.

> But we have been in beta officially since at least May 1. Why is this
> not beta?

I think Jan's point is that what we call a beta is not as stable as
what other people call a beta, and that calling the test releases
alpha releases would convey a more accurate impression of their
stability. I don't agree, but he's got a tenable position.

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-06-01 16:33:23 Re: [HACKERS] LIMITS
Previous Message Vince Vielhaber 1999-06-01 16:26:57 Re: [HACKERS] which list?