Re: [HACKERS] LIMITS

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jan Wieck <jwieck(at)debis(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] LIMITS
Date: 1999-06-01 16:33:23
Message-ID: 199906011633.MAA01166@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> Until Marc officially releases BETA, you should allways
> >> compile clean and run initdb after cvs updates. It's not the
> >> first time you've got trapped by this.
>
> > But we have been in beta officially since at least May 1. Why is this
> > not beta?
>
> I think Jan's point is that what we call a beta is not as stable as
> what other people call a beta, and that calling the test releases
> alpha releases would convey a more accurate impression of their
> stability. I don't agree, but he's got a tenable position.

I don't think our betas are less stable, but the dump/reload requirement
is clearly not something for a beta release. We _usually_ get through a
beta release without such changes, but the MVCC stuff has required it.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Volpe 1999-06-01 17:13:36 Re: [HACKERS] New IP address datatype
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-06-01 16:30:59 Re: [HACKERS] LIMITS